
The new face of prison reform?
On Friday, an op-ed appeared in the Washington Post about the need for reducing the number of people in prison nationwide–hardly a radical idea, but one not whole-heartedly embraced by our nation:
“There is an urgent need to address the astronomical growth in the prison population, with its huge costs in dollars and lost human potential. We spent $68 billion in 2010 on corrections – 300 percent more than 25 years ago. The prison population is growing 13 times faster than the general population. These facts should trouble every American.
Our prisons might be worth the current cost if the recidivism rate were not so high, but, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, half of the prisoners released this year are expected to be back in prison within three years. If our prison policies are failing half of the time, and we know that there are more humane, effective alternatives, it is time to fundamentally rethink how we treat and rehabilitate our prisoners.”
The surprise of the piece was actually one of its authors: former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, whose byline appeared alongside known Republican prison reform advocate Pat Nolan, former leader of the California Assembly. Gingrich has not been known in the past as a criminal justice reform advocate. In fact, the “Contract With America” back in 1994, in which Gingrich played a major role, included promises to toughen prison sentences and fund more prison construction. (But then, back in the 1990s, anti-crime furor was pretty bipartisan.) Regardless, many conservatives seem to be warming to the idea of criminal justice reform as a means to more efficient government and safer communities–a natural progression from the increasing focus by the media and reform advocates on the idea of the diminishing returns on resources put into corrections.