
Ali Winston
Gang injunction opponents and Fruitvale merchants make their views known at an Oakland City Council meeting on May 3, 2011.
More than a year since Oakland filed its first gang injunction in Alameda County Superior Court, the City Council is poised to take action on outgoing City Attorney John Russo’s controversial anti-crime strategy that has polarized parts of the city and exacerbated police-community tensions.
Representatives from the Oakland Police Department and City Attorney’s office were conspicuously absent from last night’s meeting. In a joint letter to the council, Russo and Police Chief Anthony Batts said their staff was tied up with preparations for closing arguments Friday for the city’s second gang injunction against 40 alleged Norteños in the Fruitvale neighborhood.
Vice Mayor Desley Brooks, whose District 6 may be the target of a third gang injunction, was livid at the absence of OPD and City Attorney personnel and the lack of information provided to the council on the subject.
“It is incumbent on staff to be here, that’s what the charter says. It’s inappropriate,” Brooks said. “The City Attorney never received authorization to enter into this litigation.”



Records indicate Oakland City Attorney John Russo had private attorneys research a third gang injunction–this one in Area 3, East Oakland. The $19,999.98 in outside counsel costs are not included in a February 



