A look at Contra Costa County’s realignment plans

Islphoto

The clock's ticking down to realignment. (Clock in Hercules, Contra Costa County.)

By Nicole Jones

Contra Costa County officials are hosting a series of community meetings this week about the local impacts of AB109. County Probation Officer Philip Kader is leading the discussion, giving an overview of what AB109, or state realignment, is and the County’s current projections and preparation plans.The committee known as Community Corrections Partnership, has been working out the county’s AB109 plan since Governor Brown signed legislation into law several months ago. The committee includes Kader, Richmond Police Chief Chris Magnus, Sheriff David Livingston, District Attorney Mark Peterson, county Behavioral Health Chief Cynthia Belon, Public Defender Robin Lipetzky and presiding judge of Contra Costa Superior Court, Diana Becton. They are laying out a plan of how to break up the next nine months of the state’s $4.5 million realignment funds before passing on their suggestions to the County Board of Supervisors for a vote.


On Tuesday, Kadar said at least 50 percent of the budget would go the sheriff’s office for staffing and jail management. Part of this budget also includes electronic monitoring and mental health court. Then 22 percent of the budget funds will go toward probation for supervision, with about 20 percent for health services like outpatient services and drug treatment.

“There’s nothing concrete about this plan,” Kadar said, adding that the committee will be meeting every 30 days to review the plan and discuss potential changes that need to be made.

With October 1st rapidly approaching, Kadar emphasized the importance of submitting a first phase budget plan for the Board to vote on. No probation officers, public defenders, or other positions can be appropriated without a budget passed by the Board.

“This effort is a blue print,” Kadar said. “We’re trying to put together a framework that we think it will give us an idea of what we need to do immediately.”

In the next month, Contra Costa County expects to receive about 20 post-release inmates from prison, which would have happened with or without realignment. The difference now is that California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation will no longer have jurisdiction over any person who is under post-release community supervision. All parole revocations will be served in county jail instead of state prison and will now be limited to 180 days, instead of year. Only offenders previously sentenced to a term of life can be sent back to prison.

Also new, is people who violate their probation will be punished by “flash incarceration,” or immediate periods of additional jail time of at most ten days. With the certainty of punishment for parole violations, Kadar said they plan to use this tool as a way to deter recidivism.

Like many other counties, Contra Costa is taking a close look at what they have to work with. Several community members in the audience Tuesday night urged the county to collaborate with non-profits and criminal justice organizations that provide reentry services like housing, job training and drug treatment.

“There’s a belief that we can do a better job as locality in providing services to people,” Kadar said in agreement, adding that the only hold back is that the county, like most others, lack the state dollars to expand their rehabilitation services.

The committee argued that the current formula the state is using to determine how much money counties should get is flawed. Because Contra Costa has a history of not  spending a lot of money on sending people to state prison, they’ll receive less money from the state for implementing AB109 locally.

Unlike San Mateo County, Contra Costa is not worried about a lack of bed jail bed space. Between the two county facilities, there are about 190 vacant medium-security and transitional beds.

But with more inmates being absorbed in the county jail over the next few months, Michael Casten Undersheriff for Contra Costa Sheriff Department said they’ll need to build solutions inside for separating out dangerous people for breaking up gang members. Even before AB109, a needs assessment a couple of years ago made the case that Contra Costa jails needed beds within a mixture of classification. Casten said the sheriff’s office will submit a letter of intent for AB900, or lease-revenue bond financing, for jail construction within their existing facilities.

“We don’t have an option to wait,” Casten said, adding that although they have vacant beds, they’ll continue to have capacity issues until they can properly house inmates by their classification.

The next community meeting is tonight 7-9pm at the Richmond City Council Chambers.

Civic Center Campus
440 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804

  • Anonymous

    The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution and California must reduce the number of prisoners it packs in like cattle at feedlots.  The safest and most economical path is providing job and life skills training and other support before and after release. That helps ex-offenders become responsible citizens.  It saves us money and reduces new crime and new victims.

  • citizensrt2know

    The private sector has the answer and government refuses to answer because it gets in the way of their money grabbing agenda. The bail industry has successfully been providing release of inmates using post conviction surety bonds coupled with electronic monitoring in several states. Inmates have financial accountability and full time monitoring. Further, the bail industry provides release for pretrial inmates using the same. Both of these services are provided at ZERO cost to the taxpayer! Have we lost sight of these paramount issues: PUBLIC SAFETY, NO NEW TAXES, LOWER FAILURE TO APPEARS BY DEFENDANTS! The sheriff and probation are screaming fire and the private sector is standing by with the hose at no cost. Bail industry failure to appear rate is 50% less than government operated release programs; 6% versus 12%. Bail industry requires inmates to be financially accountable for their appearance to court. Government has no interest if they fail to appear. Look no further than current forfeited bonds in Sacramento County last week. 91,917 active, failure to appear warrants!!! Only 179 of those warrants are for defendants released on a private industry bail bond. Therefore, allow the private sector bail industry to solve the AB109 problem at no cost. Call the Governor and your state representative and inform them to keep the $11M dollars they are attempting to send to a problem that already has a no cost solution. Send the money to the schools and the victims of crime funds.